Sunday, May 11, 2014

Kpopalypse Defence League: 3 rounds with k-pop's haters

A lot of people seem to think I blog about Korean pop because I'm some kind of hater.  Strange as it may seem, I actually like Korean pop music, and that's why I write about it.   Of course this obvious fact escapes many fuckheaded people and I have to bear the slings and arrows of those who think I'm only here to knock k-pop down a peg, just because I didn't write a glowing review of the latest written-while-waiting-in-the-urinal-queue trashy k-ballad from their fave.  However there's another type of hater that I also come across, less-often discussed on k-pop bogs - the people who already hate k-pop on a more general level and say that "I shouldn't be listening to that".  You all know the type, because you've all had the same conversation with these music snobs that I've had:

blogidea1

In this blog I'm going to collect some of the most often-heard objections to k-pop and come up with some sensible, rational non-fangirly replies that you can use at your leisure to win arguments, influence people, or just make everyone who is giving you problems shut the fuck up for a change!  Welcome to the Kpopalypse Defence League!

kdl


Rather than invent arguments against k-pop and then tear them down, I'm going to bring the fight directly to the most influential haters that I can find by linking the three most articulate, well-written, thoughtful posts that I can locate (in under 30 seconds of searching ahem) lamenting the alleged shittiness of k-pop - and then I'm going to take their arguments apart.



Round 1: "Top 5 Reasons Why I Loathe K-pop And You Should Too".


I really like this guy's snarky tone and humourous writing - he's almost as much of a worthless cunt as I am!  We'd probably get along well in person, and his blog has a nice design with writing that's clearly had some decent effort put into it.  Pity he didn't put the same amount of effort into backing up his arguments or knowing what the fuck he's talking about where k-pop is concerned, but then that's pretty typical of anybody who goes out to shit on an entire musical genre, generally speaking.  I honestly doubt the sincerity of his "loathing", he's probably just taking the piss for a laugh and a few website clicks, but let's look at his top 5 "reasons" to loathe k-pop anyway, because they touch on some fairly familiar territory .

1. It makes other Asians hate themselves

Short answer: lol racist stereotyping

Long answer: ....because he met one girl at a ferry terminal with seemingly zero fucking self-esteem who wanted to look like a k-pop idol, and thought he'd stereotype an entire race of people's reactions based on his impressions of that one girl (and maybe a few others he's met too, that perhaps he's not telling us about).  I guess he thought that Asian listeners of k-pop who enjoy the music but are rational enough to see the image-making side of it as pure fantasy couldn't possibly exist... or at least they didn't fit with his argument, so he just left those people out.  Then he covers his racial stereotyping tracks by accusing k-pop of racism generally and goes on to call out k-pop songwriter Jenny Hyun as racist.  Well, the bit about Jenny is actually correct... I guess pot, meet kettle.  Also, it's a separate issue from the music.

2. The lyrics are stupider than 1000 glue-sniffing retards

Short answer: no shit - it's pop music

Long answer: this sort of objection ties into a larger argument that popular music has become infected with stupidity lately.  Not true - pop music in all countries of the world has always been stupid.  Truly insightful lyrics are rare, and the reason why is obvious - most people don't actually listen to music specifically for the lyrics (the sole exception being rap and even that's debatable given the roughly equal stupidity of a lot of rap lyrics).

Everyone's seen lyrical comparisons like this:


It's easy to take the most repetitive part of song A and contrast it with the least repetitive part of song B and shake our heads and use it to back up any argument that we want about who is better and why, look:


Easy come, easy go, will you let me go?
Bismillah! No, we will not let you go. (Let him go!)
Bismillah! We will not let you go. (Let him go!)
Bismillah! We will not let you go. (Let me go!)
Will not let you go. (Let me go!)
Never, never let you go
Never let me go, oh.
No, no, no, no, no, no, no.


To other men that respect what I do
Please accept my shine
Boy I know you love it
How we're smart enough to make these millions
Strong enough to bear the children
Then get back to business

That wasn't difficult to do.  Oh wow, suddenly Beyonce's song has the insightful thought-provoking lyrics and Queen's lyrics are so lazy, boring and repetitive.  Well gosh.  I guess by "lyric comparison meme logic" that must mean Beyonce is better.  Uh-huh.

Anyone who thinks that modern music k-pop or otherwise has the monopoly on shit repetitive lyrics has obviously never heard "Surfin' Bird":


A-well-a everybody's heard about the bird
B-b-b-bird, bird, bird, b-bird's the word
A-well-a bird, bird, bird, the bird is the word
A-well-a bird, bird, bird, well the bird is the word
A-well-a bird, bird, bird, b-bird's the word
A-well-a bird, bird, bird, well the bird is the word
A-well-a bird, bird, b-bird's the word
A-well-a bird, bird, bird, b-bird's the word
A-well-a bird, bird, bird, well the bird is the word
A-well-a bird, bird, b-bird's the word
A-well-a don't you know about the bird?
Well, everybody knows that the bird is the word!
A-well-a bird, bird, b-bird's the word
A-well-a...

You get the idea... and unlike Beyonce's song, or Queen's song, or Super Junior's "Sorry Sorry" or T-ara's "Bo Peep Bo Peep" (two popular targets within Korea of similar "look how dumb these lyrics are" comparison memes) the WHOLE FUCKING SONG is like this.... and it's from 1963.  So much for "lyrics are going down the tube compared to the good old days".  Even the absolute worst lyrics in k-pop are easily matched by the equally tragic and disposable gems of western pop from the 1960s.  Also, it's a separate issue from the music, which is usually what people are really interested in, rather than words.  Let's move on.

3. All boys look like hyper-faggy aliens

Short answer: Gee, I wonder where they learned that from.

Long answer: not required.  Also, it's a separate issue from the music.

4. It's more corporate than Bank Of America or Haliburton

Short answer: Yeah nah, go back to business school.

Long answer: Okay then, let's look at the figures.  The big three labels in k-pop made combined sales of $155 million in 2013, which sounds impressive but once you take away expenses, each label only made a few million dollars profit each, and JYP Entertainment even posted a loss. Still big business though, right?  Well, contrast that with the biggest labels in western pop - let's start with Universal Music who made over $4 billion in revenue for 2010 with an operating profit of $470 million.  In other words, Universal's net profit after expenses was three times what every "big" label in Korea made, put together, before their expenses were taken out (important, because k-pop labels have a fuckton of expenses, what with managing the lives of all those stars so closely).  Sony Music (home of the author's faves, Judas Priest) had similar figures in 2012, positing revenue of $5.5 billion and a net profit after expenses of $463 million.  And yes the k-pop labels are smaller arms of bigger corporate conglomerates but don't even get me started about how much money the western parent companies make.  Believe it or not, by western business standards every single k-pop music label, including SM Entertainment, would probably only qualify as a reasonably large independent record label.  Also, it's a separate issue from the music.

Oh but you didn't mean "corporate" in terms of money made, but in terms of the inner workings of the music machine?  Well then, let's move on to...

5. It's not even art, but rather the opposite: anti-art.

Short answer: I'm sorry but I think you mean "art that you don't happen to like".

Long answer: it's worth looking at the first few sentences of his argument to demonstrate the problem with it:
K-pop is never artist generated.  It’s dreamed up in board rooms full of dudes in suits who reek of garlic and soju.  The songwriting is farmed out to people whose job it is to shit sugary gold.
Let's fix it:
K-pop is artist generated.  It’s dreamed up in board rooms full of artists who reek of garlic and soju.  The songwriting is farmed out to other artists whose job it is to shit sugary gold.
People who create art are artists (even if you don't happen to like the art it's still art, objectively speaking), and someone still had to create those k-pop songs.  So what if it's not the same person as the guy or girl who is singing it?  In k-pop, the performer isn't usually the artist, it's more accurate to say that they are a crafter, and their job is to help craft the artist's vision, the artist being "those evil nasty people in the boardroom putting food on their tables by conceptualising entertainment for me to enjoy how dare they" or "that guy being the mixing board in the studio what an asshole how dare he genuinely like pop music enough to want to devote his life and livelihood to making it".  It's the difference between an architect and a builder.  Who would refuse to buy a house just because the architect wasn't also the person who laid the bricks?  People who purchase property accept that those are two very different jobs and not everybody can do both effectively.  Why should it be any different for music?

The problem is that people attach a qualitative definition to the term "art".  They throw the term "art" around like it's a compliment, and if something doesn't meet their personal standard they'll say "that's not art" but that's incorrect.  All music is art by definition.  Just because you think some art is bad doesn't mean that it stops becoming art... it's just "bad art" (to you - it might be good art to someone else).  Like it or not, even "The Baddest Female" is still art.  Yes, I went there.

clba

Also, it's a separate issue from the music.



Round 2:  "K-pop sucks. Cheap, tacky, corrupt, evil".


This forum post on a social anxiety forum of all places (can't imagine why a place like that would attract k-pop haters gosh no ahem) hits on some good points and I basically don't disagree with much of it.  However, if the author thinks that it's only Koreans who do this stuff, think again.  Let's hone down on some key points:

1.  JYP snuck Wonder Girls into the US on student visas and put them up in the dodgiest accomodation known to man. 

Short answer: I'm sorry but I can only admire JYP for this.  Someone buy him a beer!

Long answer: Sleeping in shitty falling-apart dives sounds just like a punk tour, and brings back memories of some of the tin sheds and concrete floors I slept on back in my touring days.  No singer or musician worth a damn is afraid of shitty accommodation!  JYP might have even learned the visa trick from the Australian punk scene as I can think of countless punk groups who have been snuck into my country on holiday and student visas to do tours.  I can't name names obviously, but if you've ever read about how some D-list band's tour got cancelled or postponed due to "visa problems" it's because they tried to cross borders on a holiday or student visa, the cluey customs staff eyed their road-weary musical gear with suspicion, ran their names through a Google search, found their tour announcement entries, and said "you're a professional band on tour, you need a working visa, wtf is this shit".  (Also sometimes naive groups from foreign countries slip up and give themselves away - especially easy to do if there's also a language barrier.)  This type of shit happens all the time, and it happens because holiday and student visas are easier to get.  And who knows, maybe JYPs explanation is legit anyway.  I highly doubt it, but you never know.  Also, it's a separate issue from the music.

guity

2. Korean performers must sleep with executives etc. to get into groups. 

Short answer: Yeah and that never happens in the West ahem.

Long answer: I can't give you examples because I have no proof, but certain names in western pop were apparently quite skilled in the art of blowing the right person at the right time, and it had quite a lot to do with their career advancement.  That's all I'm gonna say so don't bother asking for more details.  Also, it's a separate issue from the music.

3.  Slave contracts suck monkey cock.

Short answer: Yes they do.  So maybe don't sign one, how about that.

Long answer: I've discussed the unfairness of k-pop contracts a lot in my marketing post, and it's also been well documented elsewhere just how shitty things can be.  I think it's very important to raise awareness about things like contractual obligations in the music business, which is why I made that post.  I hope that people continue to be aware of the pitfalls and the industry can reform one day.  However, if someone understands the terms and conditions of such a contract, chooses to sign it anyway, ends up in a group like EXO and enjoys the experience, who am I to tell them that their decision was wrong?  Also, western contracts aren't much better sometimes, and occasionally, they are worse.  Also, it's a separate issue from the music.

ripsy




Round 3: "Why K-pop Sucks".


Boldly, this blogger has decided to focus somewhat on the actual musical content.  Wow!  Most people who write about music tend to sidestep talking about the music itself, usually because they don't possess the specific language to talk about musical ideas coherently.  Not that he's always talking about musical ideas coherently either ("uninspired melodies" sounds cool but what does it actually mean in real terms, for instance), but at least he's making it clear that if we're assessing the quality of a musical genre, the music itself is of primary concern, not bullshit like what visa the group fucking flew in on or how many 15-minute breaks they get for milk and cookies during dance rehearsals.  The comments he makes about shitty segues are certainly fair and I agree with that 100%.  He also acknowledges that any deficits in k-pop also appear in western pop and that the two genres are basically the same, saving me the trouble of pointing it out, also admits that some k-pop artists do have good songs, and best of all he even has a crack at k-pop's irrational fans who dive under an Internet bus for their favourite groups!  Bravo for this guy, he's pretty good!  So why wasn't this blog post called "why pop in general sometimes sucks" then, why is he even bothering to single out k-pop in particular if he readily acknowledges that it's basically the same anyway?  Well, as he says near the end:
K-pop is the mainstream trendy thing right now, so it gets the most attention.
He's done it for the web traffic, I guess.  Well played.



I hope this post has been useful to you and given you some ammunition for when someone comes up to you and says "why do you listen to k-pop, that shit sucks, man" and you ask them why and they list off a bunch of shitty not-very-well-thought-out reasons.  If I can deconstruct the above arguments, you should be able to do pretty well against some random douchebag.  If nothing else, remember the following:

kdl2

Good luck out there in real life and in cyberspace.  Kpopalypse Defence League is looking out for all kpop fans!  (Except those extreme fangirl crazies, you lot need to chill the fuck out, you're making the rest of us look stupid by association, thanks for understanding.)  Feel free to share stories of your victories against haters in the comments below!

36 comments:

  1. I think you relied too much on the "others do bad things too" argument. It's something I really don't like, it's a very weak (supplemental) argument and it makes your good points look less well thought out.
    I'm also not sure if "this is not part of the music" is a good way of thinking about it, man. I mean, there are products that are labeled as "fair trade" and stuff, because some people care about the whole process involved in what they buy. It'd be great if there were groups that had their contracts made public and everybody could see that they're not shitty slave contracts. I'd support such a business if the output is decent.That being said, most of what you said of course at applies for people that listen to western pop, but laugh about people listening to Asian pop.

    Queen's one of the best pop-rock bands of all time!
    Beyonce is ok too.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm not saying that others doing bad things is an excuse but it begs the question why should someone single out k-pop specifically instead of the music industry as a whole. Things that people pretty much have always turned a blind eye to when western labels are involved suddenly have issue if it's k-pop doing it.

      As for the process, I agree that the processes should be better but I'm not going to stop listening just because those processes are bad.... and neither is anyone else. I like your idea of the "fair trade" record contract! Maybe companies could publicly display them on a website or something...

      Delete
    2. when i was still in school i once made an argument to my Dad,it went smthing like -
      "But Dad, other kids they smoke and drink and flunk in exams, the only bad thing i do is fluk, i am a lot more decent than them,you should be happy you have a decent son.."
      After what ensued, i never again made that argument.... life lessons were learnt that day.

      Oh, we are talking K-PoP here, ok byee (flies away)

      Delete
  2. Whenever somebody asks me "Why do you listen to THAT?" (the emphasis on THAT denotes an expression of distaste and disbelief typical for such kind of question), I usually say with a smile "Because it's enjoyable FOR ME, end of the story". It's almost amazing how people judge you on the basis of what you like... as if there was only one right kind of taste. Thanks for the article, Kpopalypse.

    ReplyDelete
  3. First part of the first forum is more like generalization, and the super faggy alien part I can kinda relate lol.

    Don't forget those people who dislike what you're listening to just because they don't understand it. These guys automatically made it to my list of cunts.

    I actually tried to play some kpop song in the SUBWAY restaurant that I worked in, my co-workers were HORRIFIED. One of them called it gay, another called it weird, and the last one said it's not the right place to play kpop, majority doesn't enjoy it blah blah, am I the one being overboard in this case? Why the fuck is listening to songs you don't understand so terrifying? I wouldn't give a shit if one of my fucking friends start playing bollywood songs, i'd probably dance to it too if I liked it.

    Also, I blame songs like IGAB for making people run away from Kpop

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think most people who straight hate kpop haven't even heard of IGAB. Best to keep it that way!

      Delete
    2. A lot of people react that way to any music that doesn't make it to the Billboard 100 or whatever.Pretty much anything that diverges from western pop gets shit for it.And you think playing kpop got you those reactions..pftttt....try having your phone ringtone set to a Lamb of God song and have your phone ring at full volume at the college cafeteria.People give me looks as if I just ate some rotting baby that I sacrificed to the metalgods last night. Judgemental bastards....I only eat fresh babies dammit.

      Delete
    3. Could be worse. Could have played jpop, that shit does not click anywhere. Also kpopkalypse its awesome to get an article from someone in the industry who knows the greasy bits better than self informed bloggers

      Delete
    4. Well, if that LoG song is anything from the Sacrament album, I understand them ;)

      Delete
  4. Hmm.....another interesting post.Now if only there was a similar article to help metalheads like me.You know I used to be one of those guys who hated people who listened to kpop until one day I realized that I have never given it a fair shot.So on to youtube I went and the first thing I saw coincidentally was T-ara's Bo Peep (ALL HAIL THE CYCLOPS!!!) and then I was hooked.Don't get me wrong I still hate listening to 99% of kpop but show me the music video and I'm all for it.Its a bunch of impossibly cute Asian girls shaking their ass in front me what I'm gonna do say no ? Thats pretty much why I love this blog.I get to find that elusive 1% and also unashamed perverseness.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 99% of most music is crap tbh, I know because I get sent the 99% on a regular basis! There's more crap music out there than even what you think.

      Delete
    2. Good thing you saw T-ara first, if you see the boybands first you'll probably not even be commenting here right now lol

      Delete
    3. Hahaha...thats actually very true. Super Junior made sick to my soul.No man should be moving like that.One boyband was enough ,now I avoid them like a plague.Though I will admit that Taeyang's Wedding Dress did strike a chord with me.That tiny twist introducing that other guy halfway through pretty much made it the "The Sixth Sense" , as far as kpop MV's go.

      Delete
  5. I still believe kpop fucking sucks, but I REALLY liked this article, probably your best post ever.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I couldn't have said it better myself (with the exclusion of the f-bomb... why do people feel the need to insert it into commonplace phrases/sentences for NO APPARENT REASON? What's happening to the English language?).

      Delete
  6. Nice post, as usual. I like the golden rules too. In music, your ears is top priority.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It always amuses me when people say "music genre x sucks" and when I ask why they feel that way, the reasons have nothing to do with the actual music.

      Delete
  7. I think a lot of the lyrics that get brought up are actually kind of brilliant. Songs like "Yayaya" or "Roly Poly" or whatever are about manic emotion and having a good time, which is embodied nicely by the simplicity and even the broken grammar. Hwayoung's rap break in "Roly Poly" is perfection if you take it like it is presented in the video - just a girl at the club ad-libbing a bit about feeling pretty good and liking stuff. Feeling good and liking stuff and people are not an insignificant part of life, fucking passion is what makes things worthwhile at all. The simplicity and stupidity and the carefree borrowing of English have a kind of meaning in themselves.

    The "not artist generated" bit is such rubbish and I hate it, just like the even dumber "they don't even play their own instruments" that sometimes comes up. What am I supposed to listen to then? Classical? Opera? Naega, they don't write their own music either, even if that mattered in terms of the performance, which it does not.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If nothing else the lyrics fit the rest of the song's concept well enough which is all a lyric really needs to do. "Surfin Bird" works too.

      Delete
  8. By their logic, a symphony orchestra wouldn't be considered "real music" because the musicians were told what to play. I could bang two rusty pots together and the resulting clink-clank would be truer to the essence of music than these party poopers' flimsy rhetoric.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes this is also true. Not are they not writing their own music, nobody at the company even wrote it!

      Delete
  9. Thank you for this article. *Round of applauses.*

    ReplyDelete
  10. It's good to see someone dismiss these crazy and outright dumb reasons presented on why k-pop sucks or why people should hate on k-pop. These arguments are also prevalent within other music scenes and genres so it's not limited to k-pop.

    Those less than well thought out arguments on why K-pop sucks is one of the reason why I ended up writing my own post on the matter. I'm the author of the last example you posted by the way ^_^
    My argument on why K-pop sucks held up pretty well to your scrutiny lol. I will offer up a rebuttal on you pointing out my abstract description of "uninspired melodies". After that sentence I go on to explain what I meant by that, so it isn't just a musical term I randomly threw out there.

    Good job disemboweling those other weak arguments though.



    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It was pretty good tbh. K-pop DOES sometimes suck and I think it's important not to be rose-coloured about it. I actually enjoyed reading all three articles. However k-pop fans hear "k-pop sucks" all the time and they do get sick of it but often present weak counter-arguments so I wanted to present something that could say "well, that's pretty fuckin' subjective" but without being delusional and stupid about it like a lot of k-pop fans can be.

      Delete
  11. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I've waited a billion lightyears for an article as articulate and non-delusional like this.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Don't worry my usual non-articulate delusional style will return next post!

      Delete
  13. Oh look, it's another reddit-tier 9fag immitation.
    Just exactly what the world needs.
    I'd rather take some viagra spam over this shit.

    ReplyDelete
  14. When I was 15 yrs old, my friend was obsessed with jpop... still is, and later with kpop. Back then I was all about heavy metal so I used to tell her to stop listening to jpop because it was stupid. I wasn't interesting in western mainstream either, so back then I was against all pop (regardless of the language). Back then she only made me listen to random jpop songs, all sang by boy groups so that wasn't interesting. If she would have showed me pictures of girls, I bet I would have become a little bit interested. Bottom line, I still hide the fact that I listen kpop and ocassionally jpop from her because I know all the shit she is going to say to me.
    As for the rest of my friends, I don't promote kpop but I also don't hide it. Some of my friends make fun that I listen to kpop ONLY because they know I used to be all about heavy metal when I was in high school. And if they keep on teasing me, I just show then pictures of hot kpop female idols and they shut up.

    ReplyDelete
  15. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  16. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Another great article from Mr.Eunjung. Thumbs up, no wonder you are my fav writer. I am from India and its tough to explain people that i like K-POP music. People consider K-POP girly.How can people think that a music industry could be centered around a specific gender ?? Reason=...well,in my State, Korean dramas are really popular, they broadcast it on TV with voice dubbed in our regional dialect, and women(girls and Moms) love these dramas, and men, well dont really love dramas. So when i listen to K-POP they are like, LOL ARE YOU A GIRL? U WANNABE KOREAN LOL...It really bugs me

    The defensive arguments you provided here dont really work for me. I do tell pp its all about the music and the music videos.Even though i dont undertand a single word, i like the choreography, the production and most of all the girls(am a guy after all)...
    Concert videos dont help much as they focus the camera only on the female crowd like its some One Erection concert.People simply dont understand male K-POP lovers and simply categorize us in the belieber demographic :( Its sad being a minority....I'd add another thing..i grew up listening to Rock music in the 90s, well because Rock music was awesome pre Y2k, I still like heavy metal and i attended Iron Maiden concert in Mumbai(a big thing for a school kid who had to sneak to another state just for that). i love all kinds of music if they are good. If Beiber comes with a good song, i MAY give it a listen, really!! Sure he is be a douche,but if it sounds right, it ok for me. Kurt Cobain was coke snorter, but that didnt stop me from listening to his songs..Its all about the music..thats all

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.